We received a new unpublished decision today from the BIA administratively closing an asylum appeal because, according to the Board, our client is now eligible for Temporary Protected Status (“TPS”). We were already aware he was eligible for TPS and already started the process. But the deadline for filing was October 29th, so why is the BIA administratively closing it now? What if my client had been appealing this case without the help of an attorney and didn’t know he had become eligible for TPS in May, 2012 but needed to apply by October 29th? The Board’s closure decision itself would have been of no help to him, because it would have already been too late to apply for TPS, unless he qualified for late initial registration. We appreciate the Department of Justice’s decision to close cases that don’t need to be fought so vigorously, but it’s bizarre that the Board is only now closing this case. We’ve also never seen the BIA administratively close a case when neither party asked for that. We actually were quite fond of our asylum appeal and would like a ruling on it, but TPS is a good alternative (and is better than a denial).
- BIA Paper Color for Forms: Does it Matter?
- 7 Easy Ways to Violate Your Student Visa and Get Deported
- Can I Apply for Citizenship if I Owe Back Taxes?
- How to Expedite a Visa or Benefit Request With USCIS
- Filing a Late BIA Appeal (or failing to file a timely appeal)
- Pereira v. Sessions Opens Multiple New Doors to Defend Against Removal
- When the BIA Denies An Appeal, Consider Your Options
- Should You Hire a Lawyer for Naturalization? It Depends.
- Matter of Pena and Matter of Agour: Altering the Eligibility Standard for Relief From Removal After a Finding of Fraudulent Admission
- AAO Grants T Visa Appeal About Presence "On Account of" Trafficking