A new unpublished BIA Decision reverses an Immigration Judge’s decision denying a motion to reopen removal proceedings where the immigrant was ordered removed in absentia. Amazingly, because the immigrant “declined to state his name” at the hearing, the Judge ordered him removed in absentia for refusing to identify himself. The Board sustained the appeal and said the IJ should not have done that.
- How to Expedite a Visa or Benefit Request With USCIS
- Operation Janus and Operation Second Look: Denaturalization of Citizens With Removal Orders
- New Form I-485 is a Huge Change From Old Form
- U Visa Backlog Updates - Why is My U Visa Taking So Long?
- Here is the Old Immigration Judge Benchbook
- 7 Easy Ways to Violate Your Student Visa and Get Deported
- BIA Paper Color for Forms: Does it Matter?
- Here is the Current Immigration Judge Bench Book (Sort Of)
I am a Kansas City immigration attorney. I represent immigrants in court, on appeal, and before the USCIS in visa applications, asylum, and naturalization.