A new unpublished BIA Decision reverses an Immigration Judge’s decision denying a motion to reopen removal proceedings where the immigrant was ordered removed in absentia. Amazingly, because the immigrant “declined to state his name” at the hearing, the Judge ordered him removed in absentia for refusing to identify himself. The Board sustained the appeal and said the IJ should not have done that.
Top Posts:
- 7 Easy Ways to Violate Your Student Visa and Get Deported
- Can I Apply for Citizenship if I Owe Back Taxes?
- Still No Movement in U Visa Processing - December 2016 Edition
- Venezuelans Eligible for DED (Deferred Enforced Departure) Work Cards
- New Rule on Interpreters at USCIS Interviews - Form G-1256
- Should You Hire a Lawyer for Naturalization? It Depends.
- Pereira v. Sessions Opens Multiple New Doors to Defend Against Removal
- How to Expedite a Visa or Benefit Request With USCIS
- How Long Do Immigration Appeals in Circuit Court Take?
- EOIR Headquarters Using Rubber Signature Stamps to Make Orders Appear Like They Came From the Immigration Judge.