A new unpublished BIA Decision reverses an Immigration Judge’s decision denying a motion to reopen removal proceedings where the immigrant was ordered removed in absentia. Amazingly, because the immigrant “declined to state his name” at the hearing, the Judge ordered him removed in absentia for refusing to identify himself. The Board sustained the appeal and said the IJ should not have done that.
- How to Expedite a Visa or Benefit Request With USCIS
- U Visa Backlog Updates - Why is My U Visa Taking So Long?
- Operation Janus and Operation Second Look: Denaturalization of Citizens With Removal Orders
- Can I Apply for Citizenship if I Owe Back Taxes?
- BIA Fails to Clarify 237(a)(1)(H) Waiver Eligibility - Matter of Tima
- Should You Hire a Lawyer for Naturalization? It Depends.
- 10 Tips For Surviving the Immigration Marriage Interview
- 7 Easy Ways to Violate Your Student Visa and Get Deported
- BIA Briefing Deadlines
I am a Kansas City immigration attorney. I represent immigrants in court, on appeal, and before the USCIS in visa applications, asylum, and naturalization.