Today, the BIA published a decision in Matter of Avetisyan that fundamentally changes the power dynamic regarding requests to close a case. Until today, a person has always needed the agreement of DHS to have their case administratively closed. Matter of Gutierrez, 21 I&N Dec. 479 (BIA 1996). When President Obama announced the push to use prosecutorial discretion to close non-priority cases, he said the Department of Justice was going to have a hand in which cases get closed. But since Guttierrez gave absolute veto power to the DHS, something had to give. The new rule is that the IJ or the BIA can administratively close a case whenever doing so makes sense, without needing the permission of the DHS first.
- 7 Easy Ways to Violate Your Student Visa and Get Deported
- When the BIA Denies An Appeal, Consider Your Options
- Here is the Current Immigration Judge Bench Book (Sort Of)
- How Long Does a BIA Appeal Take?
- Employers: When it Comes to I-9 Compliance Your Employees Will Throw You Under the Bus
- BIA Paper Color for Forms: Does it Matter?
- Matter of Velasquez - Authenticating Conviction Documents in Removal Proceedings
- Discovery in Removal Proceedings - When is it Permitted?
- How Long Do Immigration Appeals in Circuit Court Take?
- U Visa Backlog Updates - Why is My U Visa Taking So Long?