In a recent unpublished decision, the Board said that an individual’s case could be reopened because of ineffective assistance of his trial counsel in not pursuing “withholding of removal” and “adjustment of status” on his behalf. Normally, these claims require a showing of prejudice, which the Board has traditionally said requires a showing that the outcome would have been different but for the attorney’s misconduct. But here, the Board said remand was appropriate where the ineffective assistance “may have affected the outcome of his proceedings.” That seems to be a significant departure from the traditional prejudice standard.
- How to Expedite a Visa or Benefit Request With USCIS
- When the BIA Denies An Appeal, Consider Your Options
- Should You Hire a Lawyer for Naturalization? It Depends.
- 7 Easy Ways to Violate Your Student Visa and Get Deported
- Can I Apply for Citizenship if I Owe Back Taxes?
- U Visa Backlog Updates - Why is My U Visa Taking So Long?
- BIA Paper Color for Forms: Does it Matter?
- Waivers for False Claims to Citizenship - is Matter of K Still Good Law?
- Immigration Court "Status Docket" - the Secret Almost Alternative to Administrative Closure
- 10 Tips For Surviving the Immigration Marriage Interview