In a recent unpublished decision, the Board said that an individual’s case could be reopened because of ineffective assistance of his trial counsel in not pursuing “withholding of removal” and “adjustment of status” on his behalf. Normally, these claims require a showing of prejudice, which the Board has traditionally said requires a showing that the outcome would have been different but for the attorney’s misconduct. But here, the Board said remand was appropriate where the ineffective assistance “may have affected the outcome of his proceedings.” That seems to be a significant departure from the traditional prejudice standard.
- 7 Easy Ways to Violate Your Student Visa and Get Deported
- Here is the Current Immigration Judge Bench Book (Sort Of)
- Can I Apply for Citizenship if I Owe Back Taxes?
- Waivers for False Claims to Citizenship - is Matter of K Still Good Law?
- Pereira v. Sessions Opens Multiple New Doors to Defend Against Removal
- Should You Hire a Lawyer for Naturalization? It Depends.
- Matter of Avetisyan - The New Standard for Administrative Closure
- 10 Tips For Surviving the Immigration Marriage Interview
- Filing a Late BIA Appeal (or failing to file a timely appeal)
- Matter of M-E-V-G- and Matter of W-G-R-