In a recent unpublished decision, the Board said that an individual’s case could be reopened because of ineffective assistance of his trial counsel in not pursuing “withholding of removal” and “adjustment of status” on his behalf. Normally, these claims require a showing of prejudice, which the Board has traditionally said requires a showing that the outcome would have been different but for the attorney’s misconduct. But here, the Board said remand was appropriate where the ineffective assistance “may have affected the outcome of his proceedings.” That seems to be a significant departure from the traditional prejudice standard.
- 7 Easy Ways to Violate Your Student Visa and Get Deported
- Should You Hire a Lawyer for Naturalization? It Depends.
- Can I Apply for Citizenship if I Owe Back Taxes?
- How to Expedite a Visa or Benefit Request With USCIS
- New Rule on Interpreters at USCIS Interviews - Form G-1256
- Filing a Late BIA Appeal (or failing to file a timely appeal)
- When the BIA Denies An Appeal, Consider Your Options
- BIA Paper Color for Forms: Does it Matter?
- Employers: When it Comes to I-9 Compliance Your Employees Will Throw You Under the Bus
- BIA Unpublished Decision on Scope of Remand