In a recent unpublished decision, the Board said that an individual’s case could be reopened because of ineffective assistance of his trial counsel in not pursuing “withholding of removal” and “adjustment of status” on his behalf. Normally, these claims require a showing of prejudice, which the Board has traditionally said requires a showing that the outcome would have been different but for the attorney’s misconduct. But here, the Board said remand was appropriate where the ineffective assistance “may have affected the outcome of his proceedings.” That seems to be a significant departure from the traditional prejudice standard.
- Can I Apply for Citizenship if I Owe Back Taxes?
- Should You Hire a Lawyer for Naturalization? It Depends.
- U Visa Backlog Updates - Why is My U Visa Taking So Long?
- When the BIA Denies An Appeal, Consider Your Options
- Still No Movement in U Visa Processing - December 2016 Edition
- Venezuelans Eligible for DED (Deferred Enforced Departure) Work Cards
- 7 Easy Ways to Violate Your Student Visa and Get Deported
- New Form I-485 is a Huge Change From Old Form
- How to Expedite a Visa or Benefit Request With USCIS
- 10 Tips For Surviving the Immigration Marriage Interview
I am a Kansas City immigration attorney. I represent immigrants in court, on appeal, and before the USCIS in visa applications, asylum, and naturalization.